Accidentally Sent $400M Worth Of ETH – But It’s Not The First Time They Are Making Such An Error Accidentally Sent $400M Worth Of ETH - But It's Not The First Time They Are Making Such An Error

  • has admitted to accidentally transferring a large stash of ETH to a rival exchange.
  • The error sparked a wave of fear over the future of the exchange, which the firm’s CEO has downplayed.
  • This is coming on the heels of FTX’s implosion, which has left the entire digital assets industry in a state of shock.

As exchanges come under the microscope in the wake of FTX’s collapse, has made a ghastly error that nearly sparked a riot among its customers.

According to on-chain data from Etherscan, sent 320,000 ETH to an address associated with a competitor, The news of the accidental transfer raised concerns amongst community members following previous claims from that customer funds are kept in cold storage with Ledger being a custodial partner.

Kris Marszalek, CEO of cleared the air by stating that the exchange’s assets are kept in cold storage but a transfer to another offline storage facility led to the error. However, a spokesperson for the exchange stated that the address belonged to, and there was no cause for alarm.

“It was supposed to be a move to a new cold storage address, but was sent to a whitelisted external exchange address,” said Marszalek.

However, the funds were returned to’s cold storage but customers raised their brows over the number of funds that were returned. Only 285K ETH were returned to the cold storage by while 35K ETH were sent to an unconfirmed address.

“In this particular case, the whitelisted address belonged to one of our corporate accounts in a 3rd party exchange instead of our cold wallet. We have since strengthened our process and systems to better manage these internal transfers,” said Marszalek. “That’s all there is to it. All our systems are operating normally.”

The ETH in question amounted to 82% of the total ETH held, but the attempts to quell the brewing crisis have not gone down well with some major players. Binance’s founder Changpeng Zhao poked holes in’s argument, warning users to stay away.

“If an exchange has to move large amounts of crypto before or after they demonstrate their wallet addresses, it is a clear sign of problems. Stay away,” tweeted Zhao.

This is not the first time is accidentally sending digital assets to the wrong address. In August, the firm confirmed that it sent over $7 million to two of its Australian-based users, originally meant to be a refund of $100.

Upon receipt of the sum, the users purchased a five-bedroom mansion, but the courts ordered them to sell the property and return the balance to the exchange.


Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on pinterest
Share on linkedin
On Key

Related Posts

Crypto Crisis Pushes BTC Mining Difficulty To Bottom Spot, Any Possibility Of Reversal?

The low profitability of BTC mining is still puzzling for many crypto fanatics and investors. There’s no surprise here, given the ever-increasing energy costs. Moreover, the bear market is also significantly impacting Bitcoin’s mining difficulty. As for now, making reasonable profits from mining Bitcoin is not probable. This fact, however, doesn’t imply that BTC mining

Bitcoin (BTC) Price Dump Incoming? On-Chain Data Reveals Bottom

Bitcoin (BTC) price failed to hold above $17k and fell to the support near $16,500 again. The BTC price remains under pressure as miner capitulation risk continues to haunt traders looking to make long positions. On-chain data reveals miners are indeed liquidating their Bitcoin holdings due to financial constraints. The effect can be easily seen