Hacker returns stolen funds to Tender.fi, gets $97K bounty reward

The bounty, which was offered via an on-chain message was approximately $97,000 or approximately 6% of the exploit amount.

The hacker behind the exploit of the decentralized finance (DeFi) lending platform Tender.fi has returned the stolen funds for a $97,000 bounty reward in Ether (ETH). 

The exploit was executed at 10:28 am UTC on Mar. 7, with Tender.fi confirming the incident on Twitter soon after citing “an unusual amount of borrows,” and adding it has paused all borrowing.

Blockchain data showed the exploiter used a price oracle glitch to borrow $1.59 million worth of assets from the protocol by depositing 1 GMX token, valued at around $71.

“It looks like your oracle was misconfigured. contact me to sort this out,” wrote the hacker in an on-chain message.

Message sent to Tender.fi from the price oracle exploiter. Source: Arbiscan

Eight hours later, the DeFi protocol announced it had come to an agreement with the “White Hat” exploiter, in which the hacker would repay all loans minus a 62.16 ETH “bounty,” worth around $97,000 at current prices. 

Another hour later, Tender.fi confirmed on Twitter that the exploiter had completed the loan repayments.

“Funds are officially SaFu, post mortem on the way,” it wrote. 

Related: DeFi lender Tender.fi suffers exploit, white hat hacker suspected

Last year in August, cross-chain Nomad Bridge appealed to exploiters that participated in a smart contract exploit that extracted $190 million in funds from the bridge in less than three hours.

Mere hours later, approximately $32.6 million worth of funds were already returned, suggesting some of the exploiters may have been white hat hackers attempting to extract funds for a later safe return.

Later in the month, nonfungible token (NFT) firm Metagame even offered a “Whitehat Prize” in the form of an NFT for anyone that proved they returned at least 90% of the funds they stole from the protocol.

Blockchain data from the Official Nomad Funds Recovery Address shows that funds continued to be returned to the recovery address since then, with the latest transaction recorded on Feb. 18, 2023, for $7,868 in Covalent Query Token (CQT).


Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on pinterest
Share on linkedin

Follow Us

Most Popular

Get The Latest Updates

Subscribe To Our Weekly Newsletter

No spam, notifications only about new products, updates.
On Key

Related Posts

Finixio Crypto: From Online Marketing to Cryptocurrency Scams?

Cryptocurrency scams have been a constant threat to the industry since its inception. These scams not only drain funds from unsuspecting investors but also contribute to the negative perception of cryptocurrency as a whole. One such company that has been experimenting with online users’ psychology is Finixio crypto. In this article, we will delve into

Binance CFTC Lawsuit Has Enough To Affect Major Crypto Downtrend?

Crypto News: The Commodities Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) lawsuit against crypto exchange Binance changed the narrative in the market, but it remains to be seen if the move still has enough legs to affect a major downtrend in cryptocurrency prices. Although the news of the lawsuit led to significant drop in Bitcoin price, it continues

Miners Dumping Bitcoin To Crypto Exchanges, BTC Price Reversal Below $25K Likely

Bitcoin price fell from $28K to $26.5K after the US CFTC sued crypto exchange Binance and its CEO Changpeng “CZ” Zhao for violating U.S. crypto trading and derivatives regulations. The crypto market considers this move as a continued regulatory crackdown against crypto. With the crypto market already facing liquidity issues, action against Binance will further

XRP Lawyer: After CFTC, SEC Could Sue Binance Over Securities Offerings

Crypto News: The Commodity Futures Trading Commission’s (CFTC) lawsuit on crypto exchange Binance made waves in the market. But the CFTC’s views on crypto classification is becoming a much bigger debate as US regulators continue enforcement actions on crypto businesses. Meanwhile, the crypto market is perceiving this as a fight between the two regulatory agencies,